Phase 2 comparison
Compare offers by real tradeoff, not headline pay.
Normalize salary, production, collections, and guarantees into comparable annual ranges while keeping contract risk, mobility burden, and mentorship quality visible.
Illustrative examples: the offers below are fictional seed data, not real employers, verified market data, or user records.
Multi-offer comparison
Normalize the tradeoffs
Fixed illustration assumptions: 192 clinical days/year, $3,000 production/day,92% collections, and70% ramp production. Lab and supply deductions are set to 0%. Non-salary ranges use a fixed 15% downside/upside; a stated hybrid base remains the modeled floor. Guarantee months use the greater of the guarantee or ramp-rate estimate for that period, then the full-rate estimate afterward. Any nonzero lab/supply deduction assumption applies only when the offer assigns that cost to the associate.
| Offer | Model | Expected annual range | Red flags | Mobility burden | Benefits / learning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Private practice mentorship offer Incomplete terms · not ranked | hybrid | $150,000–$187,700 | 27 moderate
| 32 | PTO not reviewed · tail not reviewed · written mentorship |
DSO high-comp offer Incomplete terms · not ranked | production | $148,800–$201,400 | 79 severe
| Not reviewed / unclear | PTO not reviewed · tail not reviewed · mentorship not defined in writing |
Salary ramp offer Incomplete terms · not ranked | salary | $175,000–$175,000 | 17 moderate
| 0 | PTO not reviewed · tail not reviewed · written mentorship |
• Compensation ranges are educational estimates based on the fixed assumptions shown on this page; guarantee periods use the greater of the stated guarantee or ramp-rate estimate for those months, deduction assumptions apply only to costs assigned to the associate, non-salary low/high endpoints use a fixed 15% downside/upside, and a stated hybrid base remains the floor. This is not legal, financial, tax, or employment advice.
• Ask for written definitions and production/collection reports before relying on percentage-based compensation.